Pathfinder wrath of the righteous ivory sanctum

Ultimately I feel Kingmaker is the better game, though Wrath is certainly excellent and I canвЂ™t wait to dive in again. I also really enjoyed Act 4 of Wrath, it was very reminiscent of certain locale in BaldurвЂ™s Gate 2. Kingmaker had the terrible Fey / First World shit and thankfully thereвЂ™s nothing like that in Wrath. You donвЂ™t know what youвЂ™re going to get, youвЂ™ll still be researching them in the end-game and theyвЂ™ll be producing +2/+3 items that are useless. The Crusade relic system that replaced them is disappointing. I thought the Crusade aspects were decent and certainly better than the kingdom management in Kingmaker. The Finnean kick in the nuts didnвЂ™t help. I finished the game with a +3 greatsword and my bags were FILLED with +5 holy/axiomatic/whatever longswords. Kingmaker had a huge dearth of longswords, and this time it was greatswords вЂ“ my weapon of choice, of course.

HereвЂ™s hoping the DLC companion(s?) are good - in multiple ways. Unfortunately I wonвЂ™t be changing my forum avatar. I also didnвЂ™t like how there were so many evil companions, but I guess they did it to accommodate all the evil mythic paths. Sadly, unlike (again) Kingmaker, there were no rewards for completing someoneвЂ™s personal quest. I didnвЂ™t like the Wrath companions as much as the Kingmaker companions, and I also felt their quests were slightly inferior. It was вЂ“ and remains вЂ“ the best CRPG ending IвЂ™ve ever seen. In addition, there were at least 1/3 less ending slides than Kingmaker, if not half as many.

ItвЂ™s probably too much to ask for Wrath to possibly be as good as KingmakerвЂ™s ending, and itвЂ™s not. Act 8 in Kingmaker is fantastic and revisits all the main locations and villains you encountered throughout the game and the friends you made along the way show up and help.

Pathfinder wrath of the righteous ivory sanctum